Fema Employment

Should the hounding of BNP members from state employment also apply to Fabian Society Members, i.e.New Labour?

In an affront to democratic freedom the government have sacked members of the far right nationalist party the BNP from work in the public sector.. But in the interest of equal treatment, should not members of the extreme left wing group, the communist think tank, The Fabian Society, also be similarly sacked? In a stroke this would remove, Gordon Brown, almost all of his ministers, and to quote from the Fabian Society website, 300 Fabian MPS. How strange, as I cannot recall any MP standing for election as a Fabian. But as the BNP stand for British National identity, and The Fabian Society, believe in subverting democracy from within and creating a socialist government, which would become a communist government by default, I personally, would reinstate the rights of the BNP and sack the fraudulent cowards of the, Fabian Society, who hide behind the banner of the Labour Party, whille undermining our democracy. Indeed they should be prosecuted for criminal misrepresentation. How fitting the Fabian Society emblem, a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing, is for the liar, Gordon Brown. Here's a quote from the Fabians, which will explain why New Labour says one thing, but does the other. "We are at present working ... with all our might to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local states of the world. And all the time, we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands." -- Arnold Toynbee, well-known British historian, Fabian, and member of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (the British equivalent of the Council on Foreign Relations). Should we insist on the sacking of all members of the Fabian Society on the basis that they are enemies of the state? To suggest that the Fabians are not actively subverting government belies the spiel of their own website. Their entire philosophy is based upon Fabius who used the same techniques to destroy Hanniball, from within. That's the reason for the Wold in Sheep's Clothing emblem, but they also have another. A tortoise with one taloned foot raise and the motto, When I Strike, I Strike Hard. Illustrating the virtue of a slow approach and the a decisive strike, hardly the motto for a harmless think tank, is it?

Public Comments

1. Ok I didn't read all of that, I just scanned over it, but as far as I'm concerned all politicians are twats, but especially anyone from so-called "New" Labour.
2. People need to understand that the Far Left is just as extreme and destructive for our country as the Far Right, neither are good, and I agree with neither. They both have a right to say what they want and be treated fairly- but why oh why in our "rational" society does anyone pay them heed!?
3. Here Here. All government and local government employees should be dismissed if they have ANY political allegiance to ANY political party. That would screw Labour as they have systematical planted and promoted their supporters in all jobs they can put their dirty fingers on and increased public sector jobs in quangos and loony posts not concerned with the real running of the country. Do you really think Alastair Darling, on Wednesday, is going to axe all the jobs they have created over the past 12 years.
4. Made in the UK said it all really, (don't you love what words you can get away with, due to USA censor and not UK?). But all party politicians are twits regardless of them being right or left and that include BNP wanna be politicians are even bigger twits. Much rather support an independent MP, get away from all the back slapping!
5. Which Arnold Tonybee are you quoting? Arnold J Tonybee (historian) died over 30 years ago and wrote his books over 50 years ago - his uncle Arnold Tonybe (economic historian) died in 1883 anything more recent? The Fabian Society is not a political party - it is a forum and think tank of centre left policy. They do not seek position of power nor do they seek to be elected. They research and suggest policy that people either choose to follow or not. They are completely different to the BNP which is a political party, and has a mandate for elections. I believe the next paper they are publishing contains an article written by Ian Duncan Smith - former Tory Leader. Other articles suggested is the independence of the Bank of England - wrote by Ed Balls whilst at the Financial Times in 1992 and implemented by Labour in 1997 - hardly the actions of a party bent on creating a socialist state.
6. Yes, plus the workers' revolutionary party, the communist party and all the other extreme left wing organisations that seem to escape attention from the media these days.
7. Actually it is quite likely that the RIIA / Chatham House/ Tavistock Institute had a hand in the false flag terror campaign that included the 7/7 attack and the Common Purpose/Tavistock Institute linked assassination of Jean Charles de Mendez. All should be subject to an enquiry relating to all the above. These are widley regarded as agencies of the shadow government.The silence of all the mainstream parties and media on this should immediately ring alarm bells too. The political correctness of an organization is direct proportion to its NWO approval rating. It then could be asked why the radical left so enjoy its blessing. Even more so what plans has the shadow government got for them as soon as they've exhuased their usefulness to them? Perhaps it is they who should really be more concerned.
8. You start banning groups where do you stop?More to the point,how do we stop them?
9. Anybody who is sacked for being a member of a registered political party will be able to sue the employer (in this case the government) for unfair dismissal unless they failed to declare a political affiliation or are in a job (police force) where political membership of any party is forbidden. (that is not the same as supporter which as private individuals we can hold whatever views we choose however unpalatable to others) The exception to that being organisations officially recorded as terrorist or a threat to national security. The BNP has not been cited and is a legally registered party so unless a BNP member has broken the terms and conditions relevant to that job they cannot be sacked for being in the BNP. If that occurs those involved are entitled to protection under employment law the same as anyone else. Those concerned would do better to win their case through due process and then trumpet their success rather than try to spread dubious stories of foul play. PS I don't support Labour or anyone else just interested in democracy.
10. The Fabians are part of the NWO and have Occult connections The Fabians are safe as long as they promote the Rothschilds' One World Government/WW III occult agenda or unless enough people wake up and expose the Rothschilds' One World Government/WW III occult agenda. The Tavistock Institute, which is directly implicated in the 7/7 false flag attacks, is a Rothschild controlled occult organization which specializes in mind control and mass mass manipulation techniques. It was originally set up by the English royals, who themselves are controlled by the Rothschilds, to develop propaganda methods to keep the public supporting the monarchy.. http://www.scionofzion.com/patriots_corner.htm
11. Even BNP members should be entitled to work in the public sector in my opinion. The BNP is a legal organisation and freedom of conscience is a human right. This is the thin end of the wedge....In Sadam's Iraq people had to hold Baath party membership to get a job in the public sector. I don't want us to go down that road.
12. There is a big difference between the BNP and the Fabian Society. A) The BNP hate a large portion of the British public, the Fabians don't (just the BNP and perhaps UKIP and the Tories) B) The BNP does not support democracy, the Fabians do. C) The BNP passes itself off as a political party wanting power and seats. The Fabians are a think tank for the Labour Party. D) The BNP has been around since 1980, and has caused a lot of controversy, the Fabians have been around since the 1880s and have a lot less controversy. E) The BNP members have shown themselves to be racist thugs, and no matter how hard they try to present themselves as decent upstanding members of society, they fail, because they cannot make a decent policy, and then spout on about how damn good their policies are. The Fabians do not look for controversy, they do not go around beating up black people, they do no hire hitmen, they do not write anti-semitic anti-islamic articles, they do not forment hatred in the people of the country. This is why the Fabians are left alone to do what they do, and why the BNP are hounded out for being what they are.
13. If you think the Fabian Society is far left you need to get a clue.
14. Good question. Totally agree. And we should insist on the banning of their common purpose communist brotherhood.
15. What a load of bollox. Kindly name all the Fabian members that have criminal convictions for the same sort of crimes that Griffin and co have perpetrated then I may just listen to your rants.
16. perhaps members of any party should be banned from state employment and those who are active in their places of worship why can people who work in mosques be allowed to work for the state.....they might be subjected to hate preachers and might agree with the message if they can have jobs with the state etc why can't the BNP? or is it okay to discriminate against the BNP because they are not muslim or likely to be black or asian?
17. Our country is based on the principal the we have the right to free speech,chose of religion without fear of persecution or prosecution,right to chose or work environment,and most importantly or right to be long to any political party without fear of persecution or prosecution.... these are our basic rights in this country if we allow them to be eroded throe fear were doe's the fear stop... if the government takes away those rights then surely that person has the right to sue the government for breaching there human rights to belong to the political party of there Choice... or are we one getting one step closer to a totalitarian state... ONE PARTY ONE GOVERNMENT and NO OPPOSITION !!!!!!!!!