Fema Employment

How would you feel, if it was proven, or the US government admitted, that 9-11 was an inside job?

Lowjoy, I asked such a question because I genuinely would like to know how people would feel. I wasn't suggesting anything or inviting ridicule from people who refuse to consider it as a possibility.

Public Comments

1. i'd feel proud to be Irish, all Bertie does is take a bit of money to plaster his house ;D
2. I would find it pretty hard to believe that the same government who couldn't keep an interns mouth shut about a night in the oval office, could pull off this. I realize different administrations where in office, but it's the same bureaucracy. Also if anyone thinks Bush was smart enough to be behind this, then you can't say he was an idiot too.
3. Part of me wants to say that I wouldn't be suprised... but in reality- I think I'd feel shocked and betrayed.
4. it was an inside job to make money
5. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised.
6. Betrayed. But none of that will ever happen, Bin Laden and his people would not have taken credit for it if it was. That would be an easy way to bring down this govt. by exposing them for such an act. Bin Laden would have jumped at the chance.
7. how can you talk so stupid. Both my Grandsons were there on duty in the Police that day, and did not come home for four days. It was not a job that anyone would undertake in the American Government, because they would have been lynched by the American People. Just as a matter of interest whatever prompted you to ask such a question ?
8. Don't be so daft!
9. it was an inside job and i feel kinda suckered but at the same time was our own fault... no one questioned when this happened and if we did we were called unamericans or for the terrorists...look at the comments bush made when they asked him if he would go before the 911 committee for an inquiry, he states he would meet with them but not on formal terms...why would the president not want to get the truth out especially when a week later Osama himself said he did not commit these attacks and that our Government should investigate from within.... then look at all the amazing coincidences that happened that day ...three buildings fall completely to the ground (and the guy who owned those buildings made a killing on insurance money) and im not an expert but that was probably the first and only time we will ever see that...wargames were being played the same day and the wargames were about terrorist taking over a planes and attacking US sites...sounds more like a way to create confusion so the actually planes can make it to the targets without any troubles.... but we will never know the truth because even when a new president gets elected they will fall in line and not ask questions just to keep their job like a good puppet....
10. I remember how I felt that day, I was pissed and nearly broke my hand. But since that day I have come to realize thru many days of research come to the conclusion is it was an inside job. Too many unanswered questions and past connecttions between the Bush and Bin Laudin family business investments in the past. Its all well documented. Much like GWB grandfather Prescott Bush funding Hilter in the 30s and 40s. History really does repeat. The question is: What would you do about it if it was an inside job? I continue to spread the word by showing more evidence and articles to expose the real terrorists.
11. I would have an intense feeling of "unreality" since such a thing would violate all the rules of science, common sense, and human psychology. A few points in support of this: 1. The buildings at the WTC did not “fall completely to the ground” The twin towers left a huge rubble pile hundreds of feet high. 2. Silverstein did not “own” the WTC. He was leasing out WTC7. To claim he made money on insurance is laughable. While he did have an insurance policy, insurance companies will insure only for actual economic loss, they do not issue policies that will allow you to make a profit if something bad happens. In other words, he would be permitted to take out an insurance policy that would only give him LESS than what he would lose by the collapse. He lost money because of the collapse, even with the insurance. Also, any fraud (like it was an "inside job") would be the very, very first thing an insurance company would look for. They are experts at "claims investigation." If there were the slightest evidence that 9-11 were an inside job, or that he ordered the building to be demolished, the insurance company would be in court with such evidence to resist the claim. Believe me, they don't want to pay out a billion dollars, and they don’t have to pay if they can prove "insurance fraud." 3. War-games did not create "confusion" on 9/11. The air-controllers had nothing to do with such wargames & they weren't concerned with such games. Only the air-controllers can order NORAD to intercept a passenger flight. However, the air traffic controllers could not figure out what was going on because the hijackers had turned off the transponders (these allow the planes to be absolutely located). When the 2 towers were hit, the controllers still weren’t even sure WHAT had hit the towers (they thought a small plane had hit the first tower. It had nothing to do with “wargames.” No one ordered NORAD to do anything because it was over too fast. Nor was there any question of a stand down order. Next, traffic controllers in Indianapolis thought that Flight 77 had crashed because it too had its transponder turned off & it maintained radio silence. A lot of time was lost. Finally, an alert controller in Boston noticed a flight (it was #77) was headed to Washington. The F16s were immediately ordered to intercept it at supersonic speed (going this fast was not allowed, but they did it anyway). The F16s were a few minutes too late & the Pentagon was hit.
12. 1. The Government would NEVER admit such a thing even it it was true which any rational person knows it isn't. 2. There will NEVER be proof of it being an inside job, refer to point #1. 3. EVERY crackpot 9/11 Conspiracy Theory has been proven time and time again to be completely without merit.
13. Probably about the same as if it was proven Santa Clause existed and the tooth fairy existed. Since neither is going to happen, I don't give it much thought.
14. vindicated
15. it is proven on nat geo docoumentry. no surprise